AI use is fragmented
Teams are adopting copilots, AI-enabled software and external models without one controlled view of ownership, purpose or risk.
ISO/IEC 42001 CONSULTANCY · SINGAPORE & ASEAN
Build AI governance that stands up to scrutiny.
We help organisations design and implement a practical Artificial Intelligence Management System (AIMS) aligned with ISO/IEC 42001 — from first gap assessment through implementation, internal assurance and readiness for independent certification.
Singapore-based
Implementation-led
Certification-independent
01 / WHEN ORGANISATIONS ENGAGE US
AI is already in the business.
Governance has to catch up.
ISO/IEC 42001 becomes relevant when AI use moves from isolated experimentation to something customers, leadership, regulators, auditors and employees expect the organisation to govern systematically.
Customers are asking
Enterprise clients increasingly want defensible answers about how AI is approved, monitored, challenged and controlled.
Existing policies are not enough
A policy exists, but there is no repeatable workflow for risk, impact, suppliers, incidents, change, evidence or oversight.
Certification is being considered
The organisation needs a structured path from its current controls to an implemented and auditable AIMS.
02 / WHAT WE HELP YOU BUILD
Not a document pack.
A working management system.
Our role is to help convert ISO/IEC 42001 requirements into responsibilities, decisions, controls and evidence that fit how your organisation actually develops, procures and uses AI.
AIMS scope & roadmap
Context, interested parties, boundaries, dependencies, priorities and a sequenced implementation plan.
AI inventory & ownership
A controlled view of AI systems and use cases, intended purpose, owners, suppliers, users and affected stakeholders.
Governance & decision rights
Policies, roles, approval points, escalation routes, objectives and leadership accountability.
Risk & impact framework
Practical methods for AI risk assessment, treatment, human oversight and system-level impact assessment.
Operational controls
Lifecycle, change, data, supplier, incident, monitoring, transparency and evidence processes.
Assurance & audit readiness
Internal audit, management review, corrective action and evidence preparation before independent certification.
03 / HOW AN ENGAGEMENT WORKS
A clear route from current state to certification readiness.
We can support the full AIMS build or a defined work package where your internal team already has substantial capability.
01
DIAGNOSE
Readiness & gap assessment
Review current governance, AI use, existing management systems and evidence. Define scope and priority gaps.
Typical outputs- Gap assessment
- AIMS scope options
- Implementation roadmap
02
DESIGN
AIMS architecture
Design the governance model, inventory, risk and impact workflow, policies, procedures and control ownership.
Typical outputs- Governance framework
- AI inventory structure
- Risk & impact methodology
03
EMBED
Implementation
Put processes into use across real AI use cases and build the evidence that shows controls are functioning.
Typical outputs- Operational records
- Role-based workshops
- Control implementation support
04
ASSURE
Internal assurance
Challenge the system before external audit and help leadership close implementation or evidence gaps.
Typical outputs- Internal audit
- Management review inputs
- Readiness action list
04 / CLIENT FIT
Designed for organisations that need governance to work across the enterprise.
42001 is useful whether your organisation builds AI, buys it, embeds it in products, or uses it inside everyday business processes.
Technology & AI providers
Build defensible governance around product development, model use, data, lifecycle controls and customer assurance.
Enterprise AI adopters
Bring third-party AI, copilots, automation and business use cases into a common governance system.
Organisations with existing ISO systems
Integrate AIMS with information security, privacy, quality, enterprise risk, procurement, audit and management review.
Higher-consequence AI use
Strengthen governance where AI can materially affect people, safety, employment, access, decisions or professional judgement.
05 / SINGAPORE CONTEXT
SG
Local standard. International management-system logic.
SS ISO/IEC 42001:2024 is Singapore's identical adoption of ISO/IEC 42001:2023. For organisations here, the opportunity is to connect international AIMS requirements with the governance, assurance and AI testing practices already developing in Singapore.
OUR FOCUS
We translate the standard into a practical operating model — with emphasis on scope, ownership, AI inventory, risk, impact, human oversight, supplier governance, evidence and continual improvement.
06 / WHY 42001.SG
Implementation first.
Audit-ready by design.
We do not treat ISO/IEC 42001 as a generic compliance checklist. The consultancy is structured around how AI governance needs to operate at leadership, management-system and individual AI-system levels.
Management-system integration
Reuse mature security, quality, privacy, risk and audit processes where they already work.
Human-centred AI risk
Address the organisational consequences of AI, including human oversight, judgement, accountability and work design.
42001 + 42005 capability
Connect organisation-wide AIMS governance with structured assessment of impacts from specific AI systems.
Independent certification boundary
We help you implement and prepare. Your certification decision and certification body remain independent.
07 / GOVERNANCE + IMPACT
ORGANISATIONAL AIMS
42001Build the management system
Leadership, policies, objectives, accountabilities, resources, operational controls, audit and continual improvement.
+
SYSTEM IMPACT
42005Assess real-world effects
Structure the assessment of intended and unintended impacts of particular AI systems on people, groups and society.
Explore 42005.ai ↗08 / START HERE
Not sure how far you are from a functioning AIMS?
Use the free readiness check for a directional view, or send us your current situation for a consultancy scoping discussion.
COMMON STARTING POINT
Gap assessment + implementation roadmap
A focused first engagement to establish what already exists, what can be reused, what is missing and what should happen next.
Request a scoping discussion →09 / FAQ
Questions procurement, risk and leadership teams usually ask.
What does the consultancy actually cover?
It can cover readiness and gap assessment, AIMS scope, AI inventory, governance structure, policy and objectives, AI risk and impact methods, operational controls, supplier governance, competence, evidence, internal audit, management review and certification readiness.
Do we have to build everything from scratch?
No. A strong implementation starts by identifying what can be integrated with existing information security, privacy, quality, procurement, enterprise risk, incident, audit and management review processes.
Can you certify us?
No. Consultancy and certification should remain independent. We support implementation and readiness for an audit conducted by the certification body you select.
Does this only apply to organisations developing AI?
No. ISO/IEC 42001 is also relevant to organisations that use AI-enabled products or services, including third-party AI and AI embedded in operational or professional workflows.
Where does ISO/IEC 42005 fit?
ISO/IEC 42001 provides the organisational management-system structure. ISO/IEC 42005 provides a structured approach for AI system impact assessment, helping connect enterprise governance with the consequences of specific AI systems.
ISO/IEC 42001 CONSULTANCY · SINGAPORE
Start with what you already have.
Start with what you already have.
Build what the system actually needs.
Tell us where your organisation is today, what AI is in scope and whether certification is part of the objective.
Discuss your AIMS ↗